Home > Connection Timed > Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Linux

Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Linux

Contents

google.com. (28) 10:27:01.972798 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 25588, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 73) 10.80.15.5.57551 > 208.67.222.222.domain: [bad udp cksum ff0c!] 9477+ PTR? 222.222.67.208.in-addr.arpa. (45) 10:27:03.965726 Is this a scam? All-Knowing Being is Lonely more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Stay logged in Sign up now! navigate here

What's the output of Code: getenforce ? iPhone SE powers on whenever moved, defective? What's the purpose of the same page tool? 'sudo' is not installed, I can't install it, and it asks if I am root Coprimes up to N Got water in oil But there should be at least one blank space. http://askubuntu.com/questions/743819/connection-timed-out-no-servers-could-be-reached-error

Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Linux

How can I convince players not to offload a seemingly useless weapon? Get size of std::array without an instance How to describe a person who always prefers things from other countries but not from their home countries? That looks good.

Blogs Recent Entries Best Entries Best Blogs Blog List Search Blogs Home Forums HCL Reviews Tutorials Articles Register Search Search Forums Advanced Search Search Tags Search LQ Wiki Search Tutorials/Articles Search The first command returned DNS: 8.8.8.8 and DNS: 8.8.4.4 because I had set my IPv4 to use Google's DNS server after my default wasn't working. Can you please help me with the number of spaces to be used in zone configuration files. Nslookup No Servers Could Be Reached Ubuntu What is a good method for planting Ball and Burlap trees?

Your sample covers 54 seconds which is more than long enough to expect a response to arrive. –Ladadadada Jun 15 '12 at 9:13 | show 1 more comment Your Answer Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Ubuntu more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Why does rotation occur? Homepage I have installed Ubuntu 12.04 server.

Iteration can replace Recursion? Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Fedora more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed Getting the following error. Victorian Ship Weighing How should I position two shelf supports for the best distribution of load?

Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Ubuntu

After setting to static, I can not resolve host names (to be fair I did not test it while it was DHCP). Contact Us - Advertising Info - Rules - LQ Merchandise - Donations - Contributing Member - LQ Sitemap - Main Menu Linux Forum Android Forum Chrome OS Forum Search LQ Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Linux asked 2 years ago viewed 1416 times active 2 years ago Related 1ubuntu 12.04 server doesn't resolve local domain name1How to configue a DNS server statically?5How do I set a static Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Redhat If the network is failing, how can yum install bind-tools work? –Ramesh Apr 4 '14 at 2:42 I know that direct DNS requests to that server work from my

Hot Network Questions In how many bits do I fit All-Knowing Being is Lonely What is this device attached to the seat-tube? check over here Update: Thanks to ladadada* for spotting my silly mistake. I've tried a multitude of nameservers, edited the interfaces file 100's of times with suggestions from google but nothing works. Could also allow TCP on port 53. Connection Timed Out; No Servers Could Be Reached Bind

even then i get the same timeout error for local nslookup. How to fix it?1How can I configure dnsmasq to resolve based on the source of the request?2How can I use an ACL in BIND to forward requests per zone selectively?2How to In addition, DNS can optionally use TCP, which uses TCP port 53, but while DNS can work fine without TCP, it doesn't work without UDP. his comment is here Adv Reply May 24th, 2012 #2 Deinonysus View Profile View Forum Posts Private Message 5 Cups of Ubuntu Join Date May 2012 Beans 24 Re: DNS not resolving after upgrade

A word for something that used to be unique but is now so commonplace it is no longer noticed 3% personal loan online. Connection Timed Out No Servers Could Be Reached Aix more stack exchange communities company blog Stack Exchange Inbox Reputation and Badges sign up log in tour help Tour Start here for a quick overview of the site Help Center Detailed y [[email protected] ~]# cp /var/named/reverse.zone /var/named/chroot/var/named/reverse.zone cp: overwrite `/var/named/chroot/var/named/reverse.zone'?

Do Air Traffic Controllers have to remember stall speeds for different aircraft?

Tac Anti Spam from Surrey Forum What is shiny and makes people sad when it falls? A published paper stole my unpublished results from a science fair Confusion in fraction notation Keeping someone warm in a freezing location with medieval technology Detect the missing number in a Nslookup Connection Timed Out Trying Next Origin Not the answer you're looking for?

How should I position two shelf supports for the best distribution of load? That was the problem - because TCP DNS using dig works just fine. However now it's using the dns server from resolv, connecting takes ages (reverse dns failure no doubt) and still nslookup fails. weblink Can admin see my password when I enter it?

What should I do now? I also added more test results such as dig. (I did a search/replace on the actual nameserver IPs before posting which is why you see 789.456.123.7 used. Ask Ubuntu works best with JavaScript enabled Share your knowledge at the LQ Wiki. At beginning I suspected my ISP, so I replaced my /etc/resolv.conf with following values: nameserver 208.67.222.222 nameserver 208.67.220.220 nameserver 8.8.8.8 The result is the same - I can't use browser for

It's also possibly that there might be an iptables rule stopping inbound connections. Have a look at the output of iptables -L INPUT to be sure. more hot questions question feed about us tour help blog chat data legal privacy policy work here advertising info mobile contact us feedback Technology Life / Arts Culture / Recreation Science That, indeed, uses dnsmasq (which it is not a bad thing).

Thanks, didn't expect something like this happening. –krojew Feb 23 '11 at 21:07 add a comment| Your Answer draft saved draft discarded Sign up or log in Sign up using google.com. (28) 10:27:06.974911 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 26088, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 73) 10.80.15.5.38794 > 208.67.220.220.domain: [bad udp cksum 485a!] 9477+ PTR? 222.222.67.208.in-addr.arpa. (45) 10:27:11.255383 It looks like you are using the default configuration on 12.04. asked 5 years ago viewed 11632 times active 5 years ago Related 0Bind dns server in Solaris 10 and win xp clients4BIND authoritative name server: SERVFAIL?0out of zone data BIND problem0Bind

google.com. (28) 10:27:36.999487 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 30090, offset 0, flags [DF], proto UDP (17), length 73) 10.80.15.5.34374 > 208.67.220.220.domain: [bad udp cksum 1763!] 11646+ PTR? 220.220.67.208.in-addr.arpa. (45) 10:27:37.165381 What could be the cause? unique stamp per SSH login A word for something that used to be unique but is now so commonplace it is no longer noticed Get size of std::array without an instance HTTP request status Fails Your system or network configuration does not allow Drupal to access web pages, resulting in reduced functionality.

Why is Rogue One allowed to take off from Yavin IV? would be appreciated. I guess you are restarting the service after making changes in the configuration. UNIX is a registered trademark of The Open Group.