Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x40
Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account. When booting I get this error: ata1.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x40) Before the installation I have replaced the HDD disk with new SSD - I suspect the error might be Join Us! The cdrom is not detected after boot-up. have a peek at this web-site
Here are the instructions to do so: 1) edit your /etc/apt/sources.list and add the following lines (replace
Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x40
Thanks a lot for the help so far Oleksij Rempel (olerem) wrote on 2007-12-05: #24 1. Down-voting might cost you karma, but you should consider doing so for incorrect or clearly detrimental questions and answers. http://rapidshare.com/files/74878489/linux-image-2.6.24-rc4-patched_2.6.24-rc4-patched-10.00.Custom_i386.deb check if it complete: md5sum linux-image-2.6.24-rc4-patched_2.6.24-rc4-patched-10.00.Custom_i386.deb should be: 8c6198b90c2cf050023d9e4529aab838 to install use: sudo dpkg -i linux-image-2.6.24-rc4-patched_2.6.24-rc4-patched-10.00.Custom_i386.deb to remove: sudo dpkg -r linux-image-2.6.24-rc4-patched Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2007-12-07 Changed in
See original description Add tags Tag help mike (meme) wrote on 2008-11-19: #1 sata.tar.gz Edit (26.2 KiB, application/x-tar) mike (meme) on 2008-11-22 description: updated mike (meme) wrote on 2008-11-24: #2 When If you can't ask :) or better google. Indonesian Greek Russian Catalan Simplified Chinese Spanish Brazilian Portuguese English Hi there! Last edited by scjet (2013-01-28 07:59:01) Offline #15 2013-01-29 07:37:00 BigF Member Registered: 2012-02-17 Posts: 44 Re: [Solved]Invisable SATA drives Thx, scjet, i'll keep that in mind !
http://rapidshare.com/files/74507917/linux-image-2.6.24-1-generic_2.6.24-1.1_i386.deb and then: sudo dpkg -i linux-image-2.6.24-1-generic_2.6.24-1.1_i386.deb Svein Tore Seljebotn (sveint) wrote on 2007-12-05: #23 dmesg.2.6.24-1.debug Edit (121.2 KiB, text/plain) Installed the deb which worked fine. Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x1 Report a bug This report contains Public information Edit Everyone can see this information. so only the kernel was updated, with pacman -Syyu, and packer -Syyu ?, and nuthin else.I'm wondering if the adaptec drivers got missied in some kernel-module update -although that is really additional hints With Kernel-2.6.21-3228.fc7, I no longer need the irqpoll option in Fedora to avoid the boot-up delay and the disappearance of ide assets.
I have problem with my DVD-burner. If it really hard to do this you can test this packaged kernel , but i don't guaranty any thing. You can download and try the new Hardy Heron Alpha2 release from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/hardy/alpha-2/ . It sounds like this has worked before for you in the past.Unless I misunderstood, the 1420A does, in fact, support raid 0.1,10, and JBOD.
Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x1
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes #1 27th July 2009, 06:41 PM casparoff Offline Registered User Join Date: Jul 2009 Posts: 1 DVD-rom problem (ata2.00: failed to https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/48596/ maybe that one will be shortly released and bring solution ?And yes, lol, I sure hope this would be something idiotic or simple, but it sure doesnt feel like that :-)PS Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x40 eth0: forcedeth.c: subsystem: 01028:020e bound to 0000:00:07.0 i2c-adapter i2c-0: nForce2 SMBus adapter at 0x1c00 i2c-adapter i2c-1: nForce2 SMBus adapter at 0x1c40 ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [AAZA] enabled at IRQ 22 ACPI: Comment 12 Eduard Vopicka 2007-06-16 08:19:59 EDT kernel-2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 seems to fix this for me.
ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNK8] (IRQs 5 *7 9 10 11 14 15) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LIGP] (IRQs 5 7 9 10 11 14 15) *0, disabled. http://technologyprometheus.com/failed-to/oblivion-failed-to-initialize-renderer-getadapterdesc-failed.html Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. ACPI: IRQ15 used by override. Bug27502 - (punkeroso) ata2.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x4) with PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-212D (punkeroso) Summary: ata2.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x4) with PIONEER DVD-RW DVR-212D Status: CLOSED CODE_FIX Product: IO/Storage Classification:
Comment 1 punkeroso 2011-01-24 15:15:11 UTC Created attachment 45022 [details] This patch solves the problem Comment 2 Tejun Heo 2011-01-24 15:30:21 UTC Would you mind submitting the patch yourself? If you investigate the dmesg log you'll see that it does indeed "find" the disk, but for some reason it can't connect/use it. ata2.00: ATAPI: Pioneer CD-ROM ATAPI Model DR-A24X 0102, E1.02, max MWDMA2 ata2.00: NOSETXFER but PATA detected - can't skip SETXFER, might malfunction ata2.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x100) ... Source Check out the FAQ!
Thanks! Install went fine (using Gutsy DVD), but reboot hung as described. Comment 5 Frank Cox 2007-06-02 01:00:11 EDT I have been doing some further experimentation with IDE-config bios settings.
With the yum update of 18.104.22.168-41.fc7, I get these errors repeatedly: ata1.00: failed to set xfermode (errmask=0x40) COMRESET failed (-16) This also occurs with the vanilla kernel.org 22.214.171.124 and 126.96.36.199 kernels.
IIRC, the goal is to completely eliminate the old IDE > subsystem in favor of libata. On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 04:19:16AM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote: > Tejun Heo put forth on 3/24/2010 7:38 PM: > > Hello, > > > > On 03/16/2010 09:26 AM, pardon mi bad english :-(PS2. It could, but it would assume that the BIOS has set the right mode which seems rather dangerous.
feel free to ask if you need more details about this system Offline #2 2013-01-24 14:19:50 scjet Member From: Canada Registered: 2010-12-01 Posts: 1,463 Re: [Solved]Invisable SATA drives 10 x 2Tb How should I fix it? This information was last pulled on 2016-12-27. http://technologyprometheus.com/failed-to/failed-to-retrieve-cluster-name-from-the-database-reason-parser-failed-to-initialize.html Last edited by BigF (2013-01-28 02:55:18) Offline #14 2013-01-28 07:56:13 scjet Member From: Canada Registered: 2010-12-01 Posts: 1,463 Re: [Solved]Invisable SATA drives @BigF btw, don't forget to mark/edit this thread title
Maybe the drive needs >>>> ATA_HORKAGE_NOSETXFER? I solved the message problem on Linux luisraul 2.6.20 with irqpoll, but the disk access performance is very low such as 20MB/s which should be ususally above 40MB/s. I'm having the same problem with another Pioneer unit (surprise) and commented about it on the flyspray bug opened by whaevr, but got no response so far... Thank your helpers by up-voting their comments and answers.
nf_conntrack version 0.5.0 (16384 buckets, 65536 max) vnet1: Dropping NETIF_F_UFO since no NETIF_F_HW_CSUM feature. Changed in linux: status: In Progress → Incomplete Amit Kucheria (amitk) wrote on 2008-01-11: #34 commit a21d5350a950cffaabd443ca7855c52dc06c36fb in the gutsy tree Changed in linux-source-2.6.22: status: In Progress → Fix Committed Launchpad xubuntu-8.10-alternate: Linux version 2.6.27-7-generic ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.3.2 (Ubuntu 4.3.2-1ubuntu10) ) #1 SMP Fri Oct 24 06:42:44 UTC 2008 (Ubuntu 2.6.27-7.14-generic) kernel: [ 3.720097] ata2: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus Attached below, will attach it to bugzilla.kernel.org aswell.
Thanks in advance Leann Ogasawara (leannogasawara) wrote on 2007-12-04: #18 Hi Svein, Unfortunately the Hardy Heron Alpha1 was released with the 2.6.22 kernel.