Home > Return Code > Return Code 142

Return Code 142

No, register now. Email Address (Optional) Your feedback has been submitted successfully! To: [email protected] Check it out. > -- Regards, Gagan Brahmi (SKY) +919860091019 (¨`ˇ.ˇ´¨) Always `ˇ.¸(¨`ˇ.ˇ´¨) Keep (¨`ˇ.ˇ´¨)¸.ˇ´ Smiling! `ˇ.¸.ˇ´ Thread view [Nagios-users] Return code of 142 is out of bounds From: victory navigate here

No Yes MVSFORUMS.comA Community of and for MVS Professionals FAQ Search Quick Manuals Register Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in SQL return code -142 MVSFORUMS.com Regards, On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Mat W wrote: there's the FAQ... Need another reason to go? 24-hour hacker lounge. This page was generated at 1 minute ago.

Unix returns codes 0, 1 or 2. I noticed in the comments for the plugin that someone else had similar issues: 1) Manage SNMP timeout. Icinga-Doc: (de) (en) PNP-Troubleshooting (de) (en) Quote Report Content Go to Page Top bboydo Beginner Posts 1 Number of hosts 200 Number of services 5 Operating Systems debian 4 Jun 6th Any suggestions on how to debug this? > > -Gunnar > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________

CC: [email protected] Hoping to get a solution to this problem here. i'm retired 0 Kudos Reply The opinions expressed above are the personal opinions of the authors, not of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Can any body through some light on this SQL.

All times are GMT1. It is possible that updates have been made to the original version after this document was translated and published. The script calls the onbar utility to back up the logical log as soon as it fills up. https://www.monitoring-plugins.org/archive/devel/2002-December/000334.html This normally happens with snmp-load checks or snmp-disk checks.

I am using the following plugin to monitor our nSeries storage (I am also using check_mk): exchange.nagios.org/directory/…p/Check-Netapp-NG/details It works great, except for one thing. I could not find anything related to this problem over the internet. sure you don't mean $HOSTADDRESS$ instead? > > -- > Mat W. - http://www.techadre.com > > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:34:17 +0530 > Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] By using this site, you accept the Terms of Use and Rules of Participation. End of content United StatesHewlett Packard Enterprise International CorporateCorporateAccessibilityCareersContact UsCorporate ResponsibilityEventsHewlett Packard LabsInvestor RelationsLeadershipNewsroomSitemapPartnersPartnersFind a PartnerPartner

When a command terminates on a fatal signal N, bash uses the value of 128+N as the exit status. http://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21173842 A non-zero exit status indicates failure. No Yes How can we make this article more helpful? http://www.nagios.org/faqs/viewfaq.php?faq_id=17 I think this can also happen when some checks returns -no- value, or return a string when expecting an integer, etc.

This normally happens with snmp-load checks or snmp-disk checks. check over here I have been encountering this strange error intermittently on a few checks. (Return code of 142 is out of bounds) I am using the nagios with snmp (net-snmp-5.2 & net-snmp-5.3) on But interestingly, error "Return code of 142" started to show up from version 3.x. http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_BR_life_in_synch_062009 Re: [Nagios-users] Return code of 142 is out of bounds From: victory - 2009-06-20 06:04:19 Attachments: Message as HTML I am using the snmp commands.

To: [email protected] Register today! The following are a coupld of examples: check_snmp_ntpstat -H $HOSTNAME$ -C COMMUNITY_NAME check_snmp_disk -H $HOSTNAME$ -C COMMUNITY_NAME I have seen the faqs mentioned by you and it says the same thing http://technologyprometheus.com/return-code/vsam-catalog-return-code-is-8-reason-code-is-igg0cleg-42.html xsquared_uk Beginner Posts 1 Number of hosts 150 Number of services 500 Operating Systems CentOS 1 Return code of 142 is out of bounds in plugin Check Netapp NG Jan 2nd

I could not find anything related to this problem over the internet. We had some informix script running, but exiting with this return code. Pete 0 Kudos Reply Jack Werner Frequent Advisor Options Mark as New Bookmark Subscribe Subscribe to RSS Feed Highlight Print Email to a Friend Report Inappropriate Content ‎02-27-2003 03:16 PM ‎02-27-2003

I have tried it with $HOSTADDRESS$ as well.

Yes No OK OK Cancel X Skip to ContentSkip to FooterSolutions Transform to a Hybrid Infrastructure Protect Your Digital Enterprise Empower the Data-Driven Organization Enable Workplace Productivity Cloud Security Big If the correct VxFS libraries are not installed, the backup fails with status 142.The following appears in the log:For most snapshot backups, the following message appears in the /usr/openv/netbackup/logs/bpfis log on Two days of sessions, one day of unconference: $250. I could not find anything related to this problem over the internet.

are all under control. Can you recreate this from the command line? -- Mat W. - http://www.techadre.com Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:38:18 +0530 From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: [Nagios-users] Return code of 142 is Can you recreate this from the command line? -- Mat W. - http://www.techadre.com Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:38:18 +0530 From: [email protected] weblink Portland, OR, June 17-19.

com> Date: 2009-06-22 14:36:49 Message-ID: BAY123-W40E387B3DF8EE57D48D50986390 () phx ! Sorry, we couldn't post your feedback right now, please try again later. I have been encountering this strange error intermittently on a few checks. (Return code of 142 is out of bounds) I am using the nagios with snmp (net-snmp-5.2 & net-snmp-5.3) on sure you don't mean $HOSTADDRESS$ instead? -- Mat W. - http://www.techadre.com Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:34:17 +0530 Subject: Re: [Nagios-users] Return code of 142 is out of bounds From: [email protected]

Regards, On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Mat W wrote: > there's the FAQ... The statement might be valid for other IBM relational database products or it might be valid in another context.